Vacancy tax is pointless, say Vancouver sales agents

Empty abodes in Vancouver will be slapped with a vacancy tax, that one sales agent says amounts to little more than a slap on the wrist.

While the hope is that the tax could free up as many as 25,000 empty units for rent in a city suffering from a rental supply shortage, the 1% vacancy tax likely won’t dissuade owners willing to forgo rental revenue, says Marilou J. Appleby of Dexter Associates Realty.

Homeowners must declare their property’s status annually, however, properties for which no declaration is filed by February 2 will be considered vacant and, in addition to being subjected to the tax, will be fined $250.
An amount Appleby believes is palty.

Moreover, she says it’s affecting Vancouverites who spend part of the year away and don’t want to rent their homes out to strangers.

“Owners are not thrilled about it,” said Appleby. “A lot of people in Vancouver spend winters down south and they have to have their places rented. In my opinion, it’s not going to solve any problems. Really, who it will hurt again are Vancouverites who are living a very normal life, who want to have the opportunity to spend winter in a warmer climate.

“I live in downtown Vancouver and people talk about dark buildings, but I don’t see that. There’s a very vibrant downtown community.”

She also said that if a homeowner can afford to leave the place vacant, taxing them 1% practically amounts to asking them for their pocket change.

“One percent could be substantial to some people, but if you’re allowing your place to stay vacant then you’re losing revenue anyway, so what’s 1%?” she said. “That’s why it’s a useless tax.”

Mahmoud Ahmed, managing broker of Nu Stream Realty, agrees with Appleby.

“The vacancy tax won’t do anything,” he said. “There’s a lot of money in the city, so 1% won’t make a lot of difference. If they don’t need the rent, that’s why it’s sitting empty anyway. It’s not going to be the solution for affordable housing.

“Most homes that are vacant are not entry-level homes, they’re mansions. It won’t make an impact on the rental market because most people don’t have $10,000 a month to spend on rent.”

As for how the tax will affect the market, Ahmed says it’s far too early to tell. But he says the 15% foreign buyer tax only managed to cool down the market temporarily, therefore, a 1% tax probably won’t even make a dent.

“Fifteen percent is a big hit, but 1% won’t do damage,” he said.

Are you looking to invest in property? If you like, we can get one of our mortgage experts to tell you exactly how much you can afford to borrow, which is the best mortgage for you or how much they could save you right now if you have an existing mortgage. Click here to get help choosing the best mortgage rate

COMMENTS

  • by Chicklettes2 2017-11-10 11:52:47 AM

    This tax is unbelievable! You have bought and paid for a home. You own it. Yet the government feels they have the right to make decisions about your home. How can they put taxes on empty homes yet restrictions for Air BnB are being tabled.

  • by M 2017-11-10 12:35:51 PM

    It's the fanaticism of politicians who decide that it's they that own your property after all. Just another cynical way of hiking taxes.

  • by 2017-11-10 12:52:16 PM

    I don't believe the city nor the government has the right to tax anyone for something they have paid for and continue to pay for. They should mind their own business. Why don't we just call ourselves Cuba north?

Get help choosing the best mortgage rate

Just fill in a few details, and we'll arrange for a Mortgage adviser to help you find the best mortgage for your needs

  • How soon do you want a mortgage?
  • Name
  • Where do you live?
  • Phone number
  • E-mail address

Industry news

Submit a press release

Poll

Do you invest in commercial properties?