Canadian Realestate Magazine forum is the place for positive industry interaction and welcomes your professional and informed opinion.

Brokerage: New Ontario housing plan a negative for investors

Notify me of new replies via email
Canadian Realestate Magazine | 21 Apr 2017, 12:41 PM Agree 0
Ontario’s new “Fair Housing Plan” is a positive for local residents, according to one industry player, but it could squeeze investors out of Toronto’s hot housing market
  • Jen | 21 Apr 2017, 01:30 PM Agree 0
    I don't think we should be making apologies to wealthy foreign investors. Government's job is to represent the average Canadian. If this puts even one more Ontario family into a home, rented or owned, or helps an Ontario investor to build wealth, we should be happy.
  • | 21 Apr 2017, 03:03 PM Agree 1
    The article does not make reference to "foreign" investors at any point.

    In my experience (I am a Realtor in the Toronto market), the vast majority of these investors are local investors from the GTA. This is exactly the issue I have with the policy announcement from yesterday. Policy cannot be created on hunches, but facts and stats. When question as to what percentage of bidding wars are won by foreign investors, the Ontario Finance Minister had no answer, and frankly no numbers to cite. Is it 3% or 40%? This is vital before any policy is introduced. The timing of this plan reeks of a struggling party hoping to stay in power. Also, remember that foreigners cannot cast a vote, so this is a purely political move.

    It is very easy to point the finger at the "evil, rich foreigner", but the issue in the GTA is clearly domestic speculation. Home owners pulling out equity and purchasing investment condos and homes are driving up prices. I have several clients who have purchased 3-4 condos as investments and have enjoyed several years of great returns. This is the issue, not the Chinese. And why is this so? Because money has never been cheaper and with enough equity, a homeowner can accumulate a substantial number of properties. If the government really cared about the market, they would increase interest rates to more realistic levels. Having the rates so low for this many years has created this issue, but the feds are too worried (rightly so) to raise them for fear of economic collateral damage.

    The other issue is that these domestic investors are providing places to live for a growing GTA population. If these units did not exist, then we would have a rental supply issue even worse than it is now. So, are these people to blame for the price appreciation or be commended for providing rental supply for a region bursting at the seams?

    There is no easy answers, but trust me when I tell you that this is not a foreign driven issue.
  • Gordon J | 21 Apr 2017, 03:04 PM Agree 0
    If this 'plan' in fact squeezes investors out of the Toronto housing market, would it not further reduce the supply of rental units?
  • Jeremy | 05 May 2017, 04:58 PM Agree 0


    1. Drivers - $1,000
    2. Advertising agents - $1,700
    3. Real estate experts/brokers - $2,100
    4. Marketing manager - $2,400
    5. Public relations agent - $2,300
    6. Staff accountants - $2,700
    7. Receptionists - $1,500. e.t.c.
    There are other vacant positions so interested people can apply via the company's
    application email on Application entries are now
Post a reply