Canadian Realestate Magazine forum is the place for positive industry interaction and welcomes your professional and informed opinion.

The real cost of smoking tenants

Notify me of new replies via email
Guest | 06 May 2013, 04:48 AM Agree 0

The study, sponsored by smoking-cessation drug producer Pfizer Canada, canvassed 401 real estate agents and brokers for their take on selling properties where smoking routinely took place.
Some 56 per cent of those real estate professionals said buyers are less likely to purchase a home where people have smoked.
About 27 per cent said buyers are flat-out unwilling to buy a home where resident’s smoked.
There’s more: The survey concludes that smoking in a house can reduce property value upwards of 29 per cent.
Estimates are that 15 per cent of Canadian homes have one or more regular smokers.
But landlords looking to prevent smokers from doing so in their properties may face a challenge in most provinces.
In Ontario, for example, landlords can include a no-smoking clause in any lease, writes real estate lawyer Mark Weisleder, but the building should have a clear no-smoking policy and tenants living in the building prior to the change, cannot be forced to adhere.
Also, “if (tenants) sign a lease that says no smoking, and later smoke, you cannot evict them just because they broke their promise made in the lease.”
  • Ron Cameron | 07 May 2013, 07:37 PM Agree 0
    Since the various Canadian Provincial Governments take a
    considerable amount of tax off a package of smokes, it's a catch 22 situation. Nicotene is a drug with mild mind altering
    characteristics. Anybody who knows anything about home restoration knows that a simple modern seal coat followed by
    a coat of good quality latex paint will seal in the smoke odor.
    A quality carpet cleaning takes care of that. Wash the tar off
    the windows , clean the curtains and you are done. It's a bit
    of work, but well worth it.
  • Rental King | 07 May 2013, 10:59 PM Agree 0
    Disgusting habit. Remember smokers are addicted to an expensive drug that will always have priority over the rent.Smokers tend to be heavy drinkers too.
    A smoker is a red flag when I am renting to someone.
  • Em | 07 May 2013, 11:35 PM Agree 0
    What about if the landlord has mild or severe allergies to smoke , there is a no smoking policy and clause at time of lease signing but the tenants still do not adhere? Can the landlord have grounds for eviction?
  • P | 08 May 2013, 07:24 AM Agree 0
    I agree with last statement, a good odor sealing primer and paint should remove any odor but an extra step to mop down the walls/ceilings with cleaner/dissinfectant to remove any of the surface residue goes a long way. Otherwise several coats of paint could be required. This is also a good idea where there is thick grease in kitchens where a fan wasn's used but instead TSP or a grease cleaner can be used before primer.

    A good agent can help buyers see past this minor issue and take note that there are simple remedies for the problem and not to discount a home they may otherwise like.
  • Rob Lamontagne | 08 May 2013, 02:59 PM Agree 0
    One note: smoking is legally prohibited in common areas of apartment and condo buildings. There is already legislation in place in Ontario for that. But the legislation does not extend to inside their apartment. A tenant can be evicted for smoking outside of their unit after written notice.
  • LanceH | 13 May 2013, 05:45 PM Agree 0
    @Em - in the circumstance you describe, the smoker would be interfering with the Owner's "use and enjoyment", which is cause for eviction.

    Anyone knows that painters use TSP cleaning agent prior to painting. Between that and the paint, you won't smell anything. No additional sealer required. I'm a heavy smoker, most ppl walk in and can't even tell. I think our society is so over-the-top brainwashed about this stuff that it's more psychological than anything.
  • justsayin | 15 May 2013, 05:57 PM Agree 0
    there is little or no protection for landlord rights. all rights seem to serve the interests of the tenants... tenancy agreement or not.
  • Anti Pollution Activist | 20 May 2013, 02:30 AM Agree 0
    Thorough cleaning will COVER UP the smell for a while, but like urine soaked wood, you can clean it, seal it in, cover it up, but the smell will return. If you have wood in your space, the smoke is absorbed into the wood and it can take FOREVER for it to release. Smoking is nasty! And to the heavy smoker above who thinks no one can tell - you are fooling no one but yourself. Non-smokers can absolutely smell your stinky habit. I thought I had them fooled too ~ Stink free for 4 years...
  • Christine Rae | 12 Jan 2014, 06:26 PM Agree 0
    For the comments above who "blow" off smoking as a simple fix- you are all way off base! I have just a) lost three months rent as a result of tenant smoking(time to attempt to fix problem) b) used all the above and STILL the smoke smell lingers c) the costs for cleaning carpet, washing/sealing walls/ceilings; washing in out of all wood cupboards, surfaces and lights. Cleaning ducts, air in attic, garage and central vac was upwards of $15,000! NOT a simple fix and a nightmare I would not want to repeat. Smoke is insidious and expensive
  • Raven | 23 Mar 2014, 09:28 AM Agree 0
    It may be a disgusting habit and you may not rent to smokers as is your prerogative. However, that is quite a generalization you've made. I can't speak for all smokers, but as a smoker myself, I have to say that your assumption is incredibly insulting. My habit does NOT take priority over paying my rent, nor am I a drinker. Unfortunately, a few non paying renters seem to bring out the sanctimonious.
Post a reply