Canadians are actually to blame for housing crisis - developer official

Canadian consumers are largely responsible for the upward spiral of home prices in the country’s overheated markets, according to a top official of a major development company.
In a contribution piece for HuffPost Business Canada, Ben Myers—senior vice president of market research and analytics for Fortress Real Developments—argued that Canadians “often believe things are happening to them, not because of them.”
“[The] bigger reason the housing crisis is your fault: you love single-detached housing too much,” Myers stated. “An April 2016 survey conducted by Mortgage Professionals Canada of domestic non-homeowners aged 18 to 39 showed that 59 per cent of respondents want a single-detached home, while just 18 per cent desired a condominium.”
The present rate of supply replenishment just isn’t equipped to keep up with these desires, the executive said.
“[Single-detached] housing accounted for 48 per cent of housing completions in Toronto in the 1990s, but just 28 per cent since 2010 per CMHC. In Vancouver, those figures are lower at 35 per cent and 24 per cent, respectively,” Myers explained. “The situation is getting worse, singles accounted for 25 per cent of housing starts in Toronto and 19 per cent of starts in Vancouver over the past year.”
“Even if these shares were 60 per cent or higher, everyone still wouldn't be able to live in their preferred neighbourhood, there simply is not enough land to give everyone a big backyard and a two car garage.”
And for those who are not aspiring towards owning a detached home, their political choices might still be to blame.
“Have you voiced your displeasure with the greenbelt, restrictive municipal planning policies, NIMBYs? All of these factors result in high land costs and a lack of affordability,” Myers wrote scathingly. “My industry can't build you your dream house in the suburbs for a reasonable price if the price of land is skyrocketing due to building restriction and urban containment policies.”
“It is time for you to take some responsibility; you are partially at fault for high house prices in Toronto and Vancouver. Change your expectations, change your address, change your vote, or try to change other's opinions,” he concluded “Just because you support a tax on foreign buyers, less immigration, further mortgage insurance rule changes, or other demand measures doesn't mean you shouldn't also support measures to increase housing supply of all types, even if you only love single-detached housing.”

Related Stories:

GTA low-rise average price grows by more than $100K
Housing strategy spending far exceeds likely federal allocation - CMHC


Are you looking to invest in property? If you like, we can get one of our mortgage experts to tell you exactly how much you can afford to borrow, which is the best mortgage for you or how much they could save you right now if you have an existing mortgage. Click here to get help choosing the best mortgage rate


  • by Benjamin 2016-09-28 11:43:06 AM

    Couldn't agree more.

  • by Rob 2016-09-29 9:33:11 AM

    IMHO, when you drive around the GTA most of the developments are based on 2000 Sq Ft houses and up, even the so-called starter homes (townhouses), are 1600 and up with all the bells and whistles. Some where along the way our society became a what does it cost per month people. My generation (the bady boomers) where more concerned with the total cost with intent of paying it off as soon as possible. I don't know how anybody sleeps at night will a $3500 a month payment. Just because you make enough to pay it doesn't make it a smart decision especially with 2 income families. One person gets sick and the bubble bursts.

  • by Scott 2016-10-02 11:07:10 AM

    @ Rob - I agree, stupid idea to max out everything to purchase the biggest and "best" house you can afford because as you wrote, if anything happens, illness, disability, job loss, etc, you're going to have one hell of a time paying for everything.

    Personally, I'm single but I work 3 jobs and I have 4 rental properties. I'm trying to get each category to represent 25% of my income. For example, out of $100,000 I would prefer for each job to pay $25,000 ($50,000 total) and for each pair of rental properties to bring in $25,000 ($50,000 total) for a combined $100,000 in income. That way, if one job disappears, I'll only lose $25,000.

    Now......the problem? Every time I get money, it has a way of getting spent. Anyways, things all clicked now and I'm now in the debt repayment phase. Should be total debt free for 55 and then I can decide about retirement...

Get help choosing the best mortgage rate

Just fill in a few details, and we'll arrange for a Mortgage adviser to help you find the best mortgage for your needs

  • How soon do you want a mortgage?
  • Name
  • Where do you live?
  • Phone number
  • E-mail address

Industry news

Submit a press release


Do you invest in commercial properties?